Treasury Turns to Natural Capital as Kenya Unveils Biodiversity Financing Strategy


Kenya is increasingly positioning biodiversity as a strategic economic asset as the government seeks to attract private investment and reinforce fiscal stability through the launch of the Biodiversity Finance Initiative (BIOFIN).

The National Treasury of Kenya is shifting towards nature-based financing, presenting ecosystems not as environmental burdens but as productive assets that support nearly half of the country’s economy.

Officials say the initiative is intended to align government spending, private capital, and policy direction around a “nature-positive” economic model capable of delivering long-term growth while safeguarding environmental resources.

The BIOFIN programme, developed in collaboration with the United Nations Development Programme, will produce Kenya’s first detailed Biodiversity Finance Plan. The framework is expected to assess financing shortfalls, monitor existing funding flows, and identify investment opportunities that can be expanded commercially.

According to Treasury officials, biodiversity is no longer simply an environmental concern but a major economic driver, with roughly 48% of Kenya’s GDP linked to sectors that depend directly on natural ecosystems, including agriculture, tourism, energy, and water resources.

The move places Kenya among a growing number of emerging economies incorporating natural capital into fiscal and investment planning as global markets increasingly factor climate and biodiversity risks into financial decisions.

UNDP Resident Representative Jean-Luc Stalon said the initiative aims to quantify the cost of achieving biodiversity goals, establish current financing levels, and identify practical ways to close funding gaps.

Speaking during the launch in Nairobi, Stalon argued that biodiversity finance has evolved from a niche conservation issue into a central pillar of economic resilience, investment strategy, and sustainable growth.

Globally, more than 41 countries participating in BIOFIN have collectively mobilised over $2.7 billion for biodiversity-related investments, underlining rising investor interest in nature-linked financial assets.

Treasury officials acknowledged that state funding alone cannot adequately address Kenya’s biodiversity financing needs, increasing the focus on private sector involvement, blended finance models, and environmentally linked financial products.

The strategy is expected to encourage instruments such as green and blue bonds, biodiversity credits, and sustainability-linked loans, all of which are gaining traction among institutional investors pursuing environmental, social, and governance-focused opportunities.

The Kenya Bankers Association signalled support for the transition, particularly through the development of financial risk frameworks that account for nature-related disclosures.

Also Read: Lawyers Call for Justice in the Killing of Colleague Tom Ouya

Kenya’s renewable energy profile, where more than 91% of electricity generation comes from geothermal, wind, hydro, and solar sources, is also being positioned as a key advantage in attracting climate-focused investment capital.

Treasury officials maintain that stronger investment in ecosystems could help stabilise critical sectors such as agriculture, water, and energy, all of which play a major role in macroeconomic performance.

At the policy level, the government is also moving to incorporate natural capital accounting into national planning systems so that ecosystems are reflected in budgeting, investment decisions, and economic reporting.

The BIOFIN framework is expected to work alongside programmes such as the Financing Locally-Led Climate Action initiative, which channels climate resilience funding to county governments.

Environment Principal Secretary Festus Ng’eno said the framework provides a structured path for embedding biodiversity considerations into planning, budgeting, and investment processes while unlocking new financing streams.

Stakeholders warned that biodiversity degradation is already carrying economic consequences, including lower agricultural yields, rising climate adaptation costs, and greater exposure to environmental shocks.